Why is corporal punishment bad in schools

Corporal punishment should be banned because it does not do any good to students rather it affects them negatively by instilling fear, hatred and low self-esteem. It also affects them psychologically and in the development of their personality.

I believe we can win the hearts of every student by being gentle and kind with them. If we do so they will listen to us and try to improve in their studies and character.

Children should feel at home coming to school and enjoy learning. The relationship between students and teachers should be cordial. Nelson Nova S. It is very evident from this sentence that the intention behind corporal punishment is to inculcate discipline by means of fear or compulsion.

Instead values should be cultivated in love and sincerity. A healthy and balanced relationship based on respect should be the best replacement for corporal punishment. Prince Joseph 15 V Care, Surat. Some teachers may give corporal punishment because of personal emotions.

School is a place where students are supposed to study in a student friendly environment. The students spend at least hours or more with their teachers in the school; so it is important that they feel comfortable. It is believed that such punishments would help to maintain discipline in the classrooms and make the students respect the teachers.

Sadly such punishments have been in practice in India since a long time. Discipline is not taught. It is learnt. It is an attitude and a responsibility which goes together with education. Moksha Sharma 18 Mumbai. Teachers punish students to correct them so that they do not repeat the same mistake.

But sometimes this punishment makes students fear their teachers rather than respect them. It is not necessary that students have to get corporal punishment in order to learn from their mistakes, they can be made to understand. Does it work? Increased aggression Children who are hit are more likely to be aggressive toward their peers, approve of violence in relationships, bully others, and be aggressive toward their parents. Exacerbated bad behavior According to Sandra Graham-Bermann of the Child Violence and Trauma Laboratory at the University of Michigan, spanking may seem to stop bad behavior at the time, but in the long term it only makes the child behave worse.

Mental health challenges Hitting not only causes physical pain, but lingering emotional pain as well. Reduced cognitive ability The change in gray matter also affects a child's IQ, decision making, and thought processing capabilities.

Ongoing cycle of abuse A study published in Child Abuse and Neglect confirms that children who are hit are more likely to use the action to solve problems in the future, and use this same approach with their own children. What are some safer, more effective discipline options? Develop verbal communication The most important step is to develop an open, honest line of communication with your children from a very young age so that they'll become emotionally intelligent. Present consequences Show your children what'll happen if they do not behave.

Take away privileges Tell your children that if they do not cooperate, they will have to give something up, like a favorite toy. The American Academy of Pediatrics provides the following guidelines when you use this approach: Never take away something your child truly needs, such as a meal. Choose something that your child values that is related to the misbehavior.

For children under seven, withholding privileges works best if done immediately. Follow through on your promise. Give a time-out The goal of a time-out is to separate children from unacceptable behavior to allow them to pause and cool off.

The American Academy of Pediatrics suggests these tips for making time-out most effective: Set rules in advance; decide which behaviors will lead to a time-out and explain this to your child. Choose a consistent time-out spot that is a boring place with no distractions.

Resume activity when the time is up and do not dwell on what they did wrong. Try mindfulness This new form of discipline is now a huge success at several schools. The arguments for and against mainly revolve around the ethics and practicalities of using physical force as a way of maintaining student discipline. People who are for corporal punishment in schools generally take the view that, provided that the physical force can be properly regulated, it can be an effective way of maintaining discipline in an educational setting.

The idea behind the practice is to control students' behavior with pain that is deliberately inflicted, usually by a teacher.

This punishment is given for an offense that the student has committed and serves not only as discipline but also as a deterrent against future rule-breaking. Typically, the punishment is performed by striking the pupil repeatedly with some sort of implement.

For example, the palm of a hand might be hit with a ruler. Paddling being spanked with a paddle is a common way of administering corporal punishment in the US. In schools, corporal punishment is prohibited in over 30 countries globally, including Canada, Kenya, South Africa, New Zealand, and most of Europe.

The United States tends to be spilt horizontally across the middle, with Northern states generally prohibiting the practice and Southern states generally allowing it. In answer to the question: Should corporal punishment in schools be allowed? Here are the main arguments for and against that people use.

Power is of two kinds. One is obtained by the fear of punishment and the other by acts of love. Power based on love is a thousand times more effective and permanent then the one derived from fear of punishment. Two students receiving the cane in a drawing from Corporal punishment in schools has a long history and was unquestioned as method of disciplining children for centuries.

Public domain image via Wikimedia Commons. The legality of corporal punishment is decided at a state level in the US, so laws vary in different parts of the country. Where is corporal punishment legal? The blue areas show states where it is prohibited. The practice is most common in the South and Midwest. Corporal punishment is as humiliating for him who gives it as for him who receives it; it is ineffective besides. Neither shame nor physical pain have any other effect than a hardening one.

This content reflects the personal opinions of the author. Answer: Proponents argue that as a traditional form of punishment, it has a proven track record. It is also effective as a deterrent, quick to administer, and an efficient use of staff time. Answer: 1. It creates moral confusion if you tell a child that violence is wrong then subject them to physical punishment. It may make the child fear the teacher, but that's not the same as respecting them.

It can cause a child psychological harm, many will remember the punishments well into adulthood. It can be difficult to exactly define the line between what level of punishment is acceptable and not acceptable, much easier to ban it all together.

It is an out-dated way of controlling children and will present the school as old-fashioned and behind the times. It may cause psychological damage to those administering the punishment. All sorts of rules, training, vetting procedures need to be introduced to ensure that all is carried out correctly, increasing bureaucracy and expense. Things go wrong, teachers punish children unjustly, too harshly, or can be abusive in other ways,.

Children learn from the teachers and use physical punishments on other children. It is just plain immoral, we don't generally allow adults to hit each other to get their way, why should it be allowed in schools. Answer: Proponents argue that corporal punishment acts as a strong deterrent as well as a punishment, that its effects are immediate, and that it is cost-effective. Question: Why is corporal punishment not the best way to maintain discipline in schools? Answer: Critics argue that it causes emotional as well as physical harm to children, encourages the idea that using violence is an acceptable method to get one's way, is difficult to oversee, is problematic to define what level of physical punishment is appropriate and what constitutes abuse, creates an atmosphere of fear rather than respect, and promotes an out-of-date methodology that doesn't work.

Corporal Punishment has been found to occur more frequently with students who are male, poor, and ethnic minority OCR report. The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry opposes the use of corporal punishment and supports legislation outlawing its use.

Research on corporal punishment has shown that it may be harmful. Many other methods of discipline are effective in promoting self-control, eliminating undesirable behaviors and promoting desired behaviors in children.